When Engagement Becomes Engagament

Badconsultant does a LOT of work on culture and colleague engagement. Which involves surveys, and measurement, and frameworks, and systemic change, and… er… avoidance, denial, recrimination, anger, rapprochement and… well…

[billable hours]

silliness. Just plain, simple silliness.

Like the leader who, taking the guidance that ‘leaders embody the culture’, comes to believe themselves an Incan high priest on the high pyramid, slaughtering sheep and young virgins so as to pronounce that…

WE EMPOWER COLLEAGUES!

[Badconsultant whole-heartedly apologizes for the inadvertent use of the 'E' word and takes no liability for possible downstream consequences... Though we will be happy to submit a statement of work to fix them]

And in the saying, believing that the words have become reality.

Like the manager who will obsess about survey results for a year, agonizing over what possible meaning can be gleaned from the data, all the while hearing the suggestion to simply ask people what’s important to them and what would make a difference, yet clinging to the notion that somehow there is an answer that must be given to people.

Manager play-acting the role of high priest, I guess.

Engagement doesn’t come in a box, it can’t be given, it can’t be manufactured. It’s something you solicit and nurture, not build and provide.

And how ironic is it that people who most often ask “How do I grow engagement?” are those least likely to simply engage with people?

So, let us argue the questions, let us argue the theory, let us deny that the people around us are human beings who have feelings, thoughts, cares, whims and neuroses. Let us believe that people are non-chaotic, cookie-cutter-cut-outs who respond to stimulus like pavlovian dogs.

Let us live in beautiful, blissful denial.

And anyway

[ready for it]

What is the ‘best friend’ question all about, anyway?

BC

What Billy Joel can teach us about leadership and corporate culture…

I just quipped in a post about mock-authenticity using a Billy Joel snippet – so I thought I’d do him the honour of pulling up the full lyric to ‘Just The Way You Are’ and highlighting his wisdom for authentic executives everywhere…

Don’t go changing, to try and please me
You never let me down before
Don’t imagine you’re too familiar
And I don’t see you anymore

I wouldn’t leave you in times of trouble
We never could have come this far
I took the good times, I’ll take the bad times
I’ll take you just the way you are

Don’t go trying some new fashion
Don’t change the color of your hair
You always have my unspoken passion
Although I might not seem to care

I don’t want clever conversation
I never want to work that hard
I just want someone that I can talk to
I want you just the way you are.

I need to know that you will always be
The same old someone that I knew
What will it take till you believe in me
The way that I believe in you.

I said I love you and that’s forever
And this I promise from the heart
I could not love you any better
I love you just the way you are.

Anyone willing to take the ‘Just The Way You Are’ Employee Attitude Survey [(r) 2009]?

BC

What If Managers Ran Grand Central…

Tomorrow morning, BadConsultant will once again be hitting the MetroNorth-East corridor into New York, arriving at Grand Central in the midst of rush hour.

[hey, why not say "Hi!" if you spot me?]

It’s a nice trip – I get some quiet time on the train, do some thinking, listen to my iPod, get a little bit of work done – an almost zen-like zone of tranquility. And yes, I am attempting to teach the conductors to chant ‘Ommmmmm’ when they ask for the ticket. So, it was a few weeks ago, that I emerged from the train floating a little in transcendental space, thinking of everything, thinking of nothing, flowing with the energy within and without

[don't worry, there is a point coming - I just wanted you to get my mood, maaaaan]

as I stepped out of the track doorway and into the human chaos that is Grand Central in the morning.

I started walking at my usual quick pace, practising being centered, anticipating others movement, adjusting course, blending with the mass of moving humanity. Gradually I slowed. Because I noticed the absence of something (which isn’t all that easy to do in the sensory overload of New York).

There wasn’t one inter-person collision. No-one fell over. No-one was angry with anyone else. The whole thing flowed like bees in a hive, or ants in a colony. This was a society moving naturally, this was a dynamic system, self-adjusting and evolving as I watched.

I stopped walking.

How many people do you think travel through Grand Central station every day?

Hang on a second, I’ll just nip over to Wikipedia… Wow!

• Over 500,000 visitors every day
• Over 125,000 commuters every day

How big is your organization? Mine is about 75,000. Nearly twice as many people commute through Grand Central every day as my whole global organization.

And those commuters don’t seem to need managers.

No collisions. No casualties. Give and take, ebb and flow.

If managers ran Grand Central what do you think would happen?

Let’s try the obvious…

1. Each thoroughfare would be neatly organized into bi-directional walkways to ensure that people walked in the right(®) direction
2. Each of these bi-directional walkways would have designated entry and exit points with a queuing system/process to ensure smooth transition
3. Each traveler would have to have a pre-planned, approved itinerary indicating their time of departure, destination and expected seating assignment
4. Managers would stand at the doorways, to discuss the planned itinerary and to educate the traveler in question exactly how to walk – speed, gait and acceleration – as well as testing quality of footwear and appropriateness of attire
5. Each traveler would have to ensure they had necessary budget to travel prior to commencing entering the station
6. Finally (though the list could go on and on and on) there would be totally, categorically NO SIGHTSEEING – that’s right, anyone stopping to enjoy the breathtaking setting of Grand Central would be held up on a performance management infringement immediately

It’s kind of laughable, right? Yet

[sigh]

we put up with this kind of bulls*** every day in the modern organization – and assume it is the way it has to be. In fact, right now, someone reading this blog is thinking that there’s no way such anarchy/chaos could work in an organization.

[come on, I can hear the gears whirring in your brain... Even from here]

Yet, over 125,000 people get where they want to go every day without major, or even minor, catastrophe. Why is that?

1. They want (or have to) travel – i.e. there is an intention to travel
2. The destination is clear – the overhead boards tell me which train is going where I’m going, what time it leaves and which platform
3. Signage to platforms is clear
4. Nobody has a vested interest in stopping me getting where I’m going – the only time a win/lose proposition comes into play is when someone is guarding and empty seat with their bag to avoid having me sit next to them

[probably not a bad idea]

“But,” my modern organization believer screams at me, “there’s an army of people making sure that Grand Central runs smoothly so that commuters can get through quickly!”

And that’s my point. Of course there is. But I don’t see them. I don’t talk to them. I only deal with them when things are going horribly wrong because of something out of my control. And when that is fixed, they fade away again.

Hmmmm… helping me when I need it, leaving me to do my thing when everything’s running smoothly.

Maybe the question shouldn’t be ‘What If Managers Ran Grand Central?’ but instead ‘What If Grand Central Managed Your Organization?’

Oh well, I’ll see if it’s so smooth tomorrow – knowing my luck I’ve probably jinxed Grand Central and will get to watch 5 cardiac arrests, 3 broken femurs, a small brush fire (in Body Shop), 16 muggings and 1 bizarre act of biblical revelation before I get 10 yards from the platform.

[In which case I will, of course, blog about it]

Toodle-pip,

BC

Aaaahhh… Victimhood…

… You make us so comfortable when you stick around.

A little while ago, we wrote a piece called “Free Agent Nation?” covering what we perceive as the impending exodus of talent from corporations.

Before we extemporize, quantify, clarify and obfuscate, we formally want to tip the hat to Daniel Pink who wrote about the subject in Fast Company and more recently in his book – we haven’t read the book yet, but will be doing so in the near future. Despite our uncanny ability to resell work we’ve previously done, and repackage others’ intellectual property with a facade of our own creation, we absolutely, totally do not steal from our bretheren – we didn’t coin the term Free Agent Nation

[though we did add the question mark]

and want to recommend you read the original article now – it was somewhere in our subconscious as we brought a lot of ideas together over the past few weeks.

OK. That’s over – phew!

Pretty transparent, right? Our owning up to an unwitting terminology ‘borrow’. Not for us the game of “that’s not fair, we didn’t know about it” – no, here at BadConsultant towers, we tell it like it is

[especially at http://www.jobinions.com - have you left a jobinion yet?]

regardless of whether it places us in positions of jeopardy.

Would that the rest of the world would do that.

Instead, we are fed a litany of excuses, blame rants, whining, whingeing, bellyaching, caviling, criticizing, deprecation, disparagement, fault-finding, griping, grouching, grousing, grumbling, kvetching, moaning, nagging, niggling, nit-picking, overcriticizing, quibbling, scathing… Well, you get the picture, right?

Through our multi-variant, cross-referential, do-loop, mega-meta-analysis of conventional wisdom-sapping framework complexes, we’ve identified that for the majority of your workforce, victimhood is a comfortable bed-fellow. For them, it’s all your fault; your fault that…

• they didn’t hit their targets
• their ideas aren’t strong enough to move forward
• there’s in-fighting within the team
• they aren’t able to develop the skills the business needs tomorrow

They’ll whine and complain

[and all those other words we cribbed from an online thesau... er... erm... our knowledge management database]

about all of it. Only they won’t do it to your face. They’ll do it in a bar, in a cubicle, in the park… Anywhere but where they need to do it: In the moment, at work, with you and the team.

To them it’s all your fault.

And guess what? They’re totally and utterly correct. It is. Because, when it comes to bringing people to a highly engaged state, it’s highly, highly unlikely that your own leadership is telling you it’s what’s expected – so the only reason you’ll do it is because you naturally believe it’s the right thing to do and have the capability to do it. There aren’t that many of you – and it’s highly unlikely you hear the whining nearly as much as others do.

For the rest of you managers, though, you are in complicity with the victims you manage – human beings perpetuate the status quo

[here we go-oh... Rockin' all over the world! Cue Americans going "huh?!!!"]

no matter how painful. Put simply, you are comfortable managing victims.

We’re going to let that sink in.

You are comfortable managing victims.

Why? Well, if you do it like you did it yesterday, no-one can hold you accountable for today’s poor results; today’s failure was perfectly acceptable yesterday. So, why change anything?

Anyone…

Anyone…

We’ll be back soon to answer the question.

έως ότου συναντιόμαστε πάλι

BC

Mental Gymnastics (or ‘To all the paradoxes I’ve loved before’)

A couple of weeks back, BadConsultant had the unparalleled joy of mingling with a small, select group of

[patsies]

executives gathered together to pass comment on some pretty astounding internal social networking technology. Cool stuff. Lots of opportunities. Of course, being BadConsultant, we extemporized, categorized, expounded and theorized just enough to bring these potential ‘deep-pockets’ to the edge of understanding of their problems and potential solutions

[our arched eyebrows and caring forehead let them know that we were like, er, rilly, rilly understanding of their pain... The draft Statement of Work letting them know we could make it all go away soooo easily...]

Of course, aside from enjoying the sound of our own voice, BadConsultant was also listening closely for inspiration. And, sure enough, it hit us about an hour into the discourse.

Think about your company. Think about mission

[spit]

vision

[spit twice]

purpose

[spit thrice]

and values

[vomit... politely]

Now that you’ve cleansed yourself of the kool-aid, think about the words that are used, and those that are used to explain just what those words actually mean (because it’s highly unlikely that the mission, vision, purpose and values can stand on their own without clarification or translation into plain english)

[No, really, what do these values mean to YOU]

OK, chances are that once the gag-reflex calms down, you’ll recognize something like this in amongst the hyperbole.

“We will be innovative”

or

“We will think big, but act small”

or even

“The spirit of entrepreneurship is alive and well here”

Recognize that? And who could argue?

Well… Er… Us, actually…

You see, this was the blinding flash of insight that hit us at our small round-table. And the paradox in this question is so simple that it’s beautiful.

How do you lead an entrepreneur?

Because the hyperbole breaks down right there. Entrepreneurs and large corporations are mutually exclusive. It really is that simple. We have bounced this oxymoronic paradox off a number of BadConsultants over the past week and are convinced

[that it'll be chapter seven of our planned business tome]

that there isn’t an answer that keeps the distinction clean.

“Well, er, of course you can’t have complete chaos in the…”

or

“Oh… I’m sure that’s not quite what they were getting at…”

or

“Yeah, that’s right… Our execs are really full of s***, aren’t they?!!!”

And, of course, the reality is some mixture of all three plus a little bit of naive optimism – Execs really do think that entrepreneurship is possible in the modern corporation because

[they're delusional]

they think that all the stuff that is stultifying the innovation and energy in their organization, all the stuff that is introducing risk aversion at a greater rate of knots than they’re losing customers, all the stuff that gets in the way of transformational decision making is somehow voluntary – i.e. that employees are making a conscious choice not to take their ideas forward. Replete with their over-stuffed egos and illusions of hunky-doryness, these executives commit massive, grand narcissism: They just need someone to lead them.

Hmmmm… Everything in the system stays the same but we expect different results tomorrow than we did today… Isn’t that close to the common-speak definition of insanity?

So, back to the question: How do you lead an entrepreneur?

And the answer: You can’t. All you can do is set an unachievable goal that they already want to take a shot at, give them some means (but not all the means) and tell them to get going. Nothing else. Just that. It means thinking like a venture capitalist. What’s the return on investment on the idea? What’s the risk of failure? What’s the get out clause? What’s the level of confidence that this person can really take this to the next level?

Leading us to our final observational question. The one that’ll really make you go “Hmmmm” and want BadConsultant to spend some time in the next few weeks

[billing]

working through the potential impact and giving you some options.

How much of your current executive development/training/experience is specifically geared to develop venture capitalist capabilities?

Clue: It’ll be one of the following answers…

1. Huh?
2. What?
3. Why?

Until we meet again, adieu!

BC

Free Agent Nation?

It used to be that talented people expected to have to compromise their talent.

We’ll let that sink in.

It used to be…

OK. Let’s explain.

Talented people in corporations know one thing. They are forced to compromise their ability to do their best work (what comes naturally) day after day. It can be because of a bad boss, inefficient processes, a lack of commitment to corporate mission or the inability to see how their talent will be rewarded in the short and long term.

And it’s that very last bit that we’re focusing on today.

Because the ‘deal’ used to be this: ‘compromise your talent today because in the long run it will play out in a corporate career’. In fact, this is little more than the corporation-as-parent mythology and, at its root, is based on fear. Fear of what? Being unemployed without benefits, having to take risk and be judged upon your performance, to be self-reliant. In that mythology, the bigger the better: bigger salary, bigger title, bigger office, bigger retention, bigger bonus. So, safety used to be the payback for compromise on talent.

And there it is again. Used to be.

Because the promise of payback for compromise has been completely, totally and royally wiped from the map thanks to the economic soufflé currently melting markets the world over.

If the risk we described above is that of not having a corporate parent at our back, then right now, in terms of staying with a company, the risk of staying pretty much looks like the risk of going.

Risk of Staying ~ Risk of Going

Except for talented individuals, the Risk of Going also includes the promise of meaningful work, ownership, accountability, risk and the not insignificant fact that a much greater proportion of any working day is likely to be spent doing what comes naturally – being the glorious, diverse, talented individual they are.

The economic soufflé has finally proven that the endless search for bigger isn’t the be-all-and-end-all.

Corporations used to view retention risk as that of talented individuals going to competitors because of the promise of ‘bigger’. Right now, corporations should be shifting that view.

Because right now, the biggest retention risk is of talent individuals voluntarily leaving the corporation, going free agent to do exactly what they’re already paid to do and selling it to whoever they want.

The war for talent is over… The talent won… And right now, corporations are going to begin to learn that the hard way.

BC

What if… Part I

What if your customers made your selection decisions?

Technorati Tags: Business, Innovation, Leadership, Management, Tactics

Let’s do the time warp agaaaaaaaainnnnnnn…

It’s all relative anyway

Technorati Tags: Business, Leadership, Management

Innovation isn’t just for things – Part IV

So, you know what they are – now how many of them do you have?

Technorati Tags: Business, Engagement, Innovation, Management, Strategy