Lord protect me from…

Careful… I’m about to illuminate a truth that everyone knows

[think of it as a red pill moment]

but few will admit to – or do anything about.

OK. Here goes.

The reason you’re so p***ed off at work is that you’re bored.

[wait for shrieks of indignation from the 'upwardly mobile', or shrugs of 'so' from the not so upwardly mobile]

The reason you’re bored is because you are woefully underusing what you were born with and have subsequently developed: your mind, body, heart and soul.

Because you’re woefully underusing what you were born with and have subsequently developed, you are putting on weight, damaging your personal relationships and, yes, driving the future of life on this planet into the great landfill.

Because you’re bored.

Next time you’re in a meeting that nobody wants, without a clear remit, without a clear outcome, where everyone seems so keen to ‘build’ on someone else’s point so passive-aggressively, where use of ‘And’ and not ‘But’ has become a practiced art of the subtly raised eyebrow, where nothing gets done for the many $’000s of dollars compensation present in the room

[if you don't know what I'm talking about, you need this posting more than anyone]

pause and take a look around the room. All of that energy is being spent trying to stimulate mind, body, heart and soul – as if there was something real happening. Fight, fright, flight – our basic physical response to attack. Tension in the neck, legs, arms and face – our natural instinct to embodiment. Being with others in a collaborative quest – our natural proclivity to reciprocity. Passionate commitment to something we believe in – our search for meaning beyond ourselves.

That’s what we are. And because we spend so much time denying what we are

[reciprocity in the dog-eat-dog world of capitalist norms, anyone?]

the energy is wasted. And we get bored. So we invent crises just to avoid admitting that we’re bored and not expending anywhere near the energy we could if we truly became engaged in the world as a whole person.

Notice I didn’t say, engaged in work as a whole person.

Because one of the greatest boredom myths is that a strongly aligned working experience can cure everything. It can’t. Yet, every day billions of people enter the work-place

[yeah, like that's a concept that even makes sense anymore...]

with a silent prayer in their sub-conscious: Lord protect me from becoming too bored.

And work becomes a huge distraction from all the potential you are choosing not to use.

So, the next time you catch yourself in the moment, arguing a point that doesn’t need to be argued, about something that doesn’t matter – stop and think on how it’s protecting you from becoming too bored. And decide whether that’s a deal you want to make or not.

If it is, then the following symptoms are likely to develop shortly, if they aren’t already present:

  • Buying consumer electronics for meaningless technological advantage over ‘good-enough’ existing possessions
  • Going out to dinner because it’s that time of day, not because of hunger
  • Sitting watching television programs you don’t like because your partner likes them
  • Engaging in office politics to perpetuate insignificant power struggles
  • Invading nearby countries just to make use of the military machine you’ve been growing over the years

[that last one might be a stretch for some of us]

So, which is it going to be – extending some of your potential into the world with all the risk and return that can offer, or settling for a stunted life denying yourself and building endless hedges against boredom.

This badconsultant knows which one he chooses.

A Bientot

BC

Update to our literature search – Part II

A little over a year ago, we carried out our our proprietary literature search to inform Difficult Truths, Too Big to Swallow – Part I. We updated the search in November. Here’s the latest installment. As of this evening (November, April in parens), percent gain since original search:

* Change Management: 65,689 (57,604; 47,416) +38%

* Business Strategy: 72,959 (64,603; 56,102) +30%

* Organization Culture: 32,944 (28,965; 23,956) +38%

* Talent Management: 10,426 (8,970; 7,206) +45%

* People Management: 48,019 (41,848; 33,011) +45%

* Leadership: 350,084 (302,959; 256,503) +36%

What do these stats tell us? Nothing much, just that there are many more people writing books about business than actually being successful in business… All this really good advice and still the nature of commerce and capitalism has taken a nose-dive.

And now, we want to introduce the grand-daddy (or -mummy to be truly diverse) of literature search stats. As of this evening, number of books found on searching for the word ‘management’…

Wait for it…

960,499

Wait a second, let’s give that the emphasis it deserves…

960,499!!!

[nearly a million books on management and most organizations still scramble to get the basics right - sheesh!]

Cause for hope? Look at talent management and people management, finally making the catch-up run on the home stretch. Maybe organizations are finally beginning to get what it’s all about.

Maybe.

L’huego,

BC

Mental Gymnastics (or ‘To all the paradoxes I’ve loved before’)

A couple of weeks back, BadConsultant had the unparalleled joy of mingling with a small, select group of

[patsies]

executives gathered together to pass comment on some pretty astounding internal social networking technology. Cool stuff. Lots of opportunities. Of course, being BadConsultant, we extemporized, categorized, expounded and theorized just enough to bring these potential ‘deep-pockets’ to the edge of understanding of their problems and potential solutions

[our arched eyebrows and caring forehead let them know that we were like, er, rilly, rilly understanding of their pain... The draft Statement of Work letting them know we could make it all go away soooo easily...]

Of course, aside from enjoying the sound of our own voice, BadConsultant was also listening closely for inspiration. And, sure enough, it hit us about an hour into the discourse.

Think about your company. Think about mission

[spit]

vision

[spit twice]

purpose

[spit thrice]

and values

[vomit... politely]

Now that you’ve cleansed yourself of the kool-aid, think about the words that are used, and those that are used to explain just what those words actually mean (because it’s highly unlikely that the mission, vision, purpose and values can stand on their own without clarification or translation into plain english)

[No, really, what do these values mean to YOU]

OK, chances are that once the gag-reflex calms down, you’ll recognize something like this in amongst the hyperbole.

“We will be innovative”

or

“We will think big, but act small”

or even

“The spirit of entrepreneurship is alive and well here”

Recognize that? And who could argue?

Well… Er… Us, actually…

You see, this was the blinding flash of insight that hit us at our small round-table. And the paradox in this question is so simple that it’s beautiful.

How do you lead an entrepreneur?

Because the hyperbole breaks down right there. Entrepreneurs and large corporations are mutually exclusive. It really is that simple. We have bounced this oxymoronic paradox off a number of BadConsultants over the past week and are convinced

[that it'll be chapter seven of our planned business tome]

that there isn’t an answer that keeps the distinction clean.

“Well, er, of course you can’t have complete chaos in the…”

or

“Oh… I’m sure that’s not quite what they were getting at…”

or

“Yeah, that’s right… Our execs are really full of s***, aren’t they?!!!”

And, of course, the reality is some mixture of all three plus a little bit of naive optimism – Execs really do think that entrepreneurship is possible in the modern corporation because

[they're delusional]

they think that all the stuff that is stultifying the innovation and energy in their organization, all the stuff that is introducing risk aversion at a greater rate of knots than they’re losing customers, all the stuff that gets in the way of transformational decision making is somehow voluntary – i.e. that employees are making a conscious choice not to take their ideas forward. Replete with their over-stuffed egos and illusions of hunky-doryness, these executives commit massive, grand narcissism: They just need someone to lead them.

Hmmmm… Everything in the system stays the same but we expect different results tomorrow than we did today… Isn’t that close to the common-speak definition of insanity?

So, back to the question: How do you lead an entrepreneur?

And the answer: You can’t. All you can do is set an unachievable goal that they already want to take a shot at, give them some means (but not all the means) and tell them to get going. Nothing else. Just that. It means thinking like a venture capitalist. What’s the return on investment on the idea? What’s the risk of failure? What’s the get out clause? What’s the level of confidence that this person can really take this to the next level?

Leading us to our final observational question. The one that’ll really make you go “Hmmmm” and want BadConsultant to spend some time in the next few weeks

[billing]

working through the potential impact and giving you some options.

How much of your current executive development/training/experience is specifically geared to develop venture capitalist capabilities?

Clue: It’ll be one of the following answers…

  1. Huh?
  2. What?
  3. Why?

Until we meet again, adieu!

BC

Free Agent Nation?

It used to be that talented people expected to have to compromise their talent.

We’ll let that sink in.

It used to be…

OK. Let’s explain.

Talented people in corporations know one thing. They are forced to compromise their ability to do their best work (what comes naturally) day after day. It can be because of a bad boss, inefficient processes, a lack of commitment to corporate mission or the inability to see how their talent will be rewarded in the short and long term.

And it’s that very last bit that we’re focusing on today.

Because the ‘deal’ used to be this: ‘compromise your talent today because in the long run it will play out in a corporate career’. In fact, this is little more than the corporation-as-parent mythology and, at its root, is based on fear. Fear of what? Being unemployed without benefits, having to take risk and be judged upon your performance, to be self-reliant. In that mythology, the bigger the better: bigger salary, bigger title, bigger office, bigger retention, bigger bonus. So, safety used to be the payback for compromise on talent.

And there it is again. Used to be.

Because the promise of payback for compromise has been completely, totally and royally wiped from the map thanks to the economic soufflé currently melting markets the world over.

If the risk we described above is that of not having a corporate parent at our back, then right now, in terms of staying with a company, the risk of staying pretty much looks like the risk of going.

Risk of Staying ~ Risk of Going

Except for talented individuals, the Risk of Going also includes the promise of meaningful work, ownership, accountability, risk and the not insignificant fact that a much greater proportion of any working day is likely to be spent doing what comes naturally – being the glorious, diverse, talented individual they are.

The economic soufflé has finally proven that the endless search for bigger isn’t the be-all-and-end-all.

Corporations used to view retention risk as that of talented individuals going to competitors because of the promise of ‘bigger’. Right now, corporations should be shifting that view.

Because right now, the biggest retention risk is of talent individuals voluntarily leaving the corporation, going free agent to do exactly what they’re already paid to do and selling it to whoever they want.

The war for talent is over… The talent won… And right now, corporations are going to begin to learn that the hard way.

BC

Come on, let’s have some fun with…

Economic SUPERNOVA!

Technorati Tags: ,

Read the rest of this entry »

Thanks to the good folk at…

Here’s a new game you can try…

… and it’ll really stretch your imagination after the first few times

Technorati Tags: , ,

Read the rest of this entry »

Update to our literature search – Part I

Just thought we’d check…

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Read the rest of this entry »

Innovation isn’t just for things – Part IV

So, you know what they are – now how many of them do you have?

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Read the rest of this entry »

Reverse evolution

Only in corporations…
Read the rest of this entry »